Clinical studies are done to get answers. When they lack rigour, they are worse than uninformative. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking/ivermectin-convalescent-plasma-and-hydroxychloroquine-one-year-rotten-apples
Moles have attracted their share of esoteric interpretations in the past. Science offers more grounded answers. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-general-science/olives-body-are-only-skin-deep
… in which I talk about bite mark comparisons for crimes. Are they even scientific? https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=2159478
UTIs: sex differences / antibiotics / self-diagnosis / cranberry juice / probiotics / D-mannose / drinking water / peeing after sex / contraception / topical
The practice of comparing bite marks found on a victim to the teeth of a suspect has come under fire for being based on wishful
… in which I talk about the haunted scrotum and other places where we see faces that aren’t really there. It’s a type of pareidolia.